<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Robber Baron Blog - Latest Comments in Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://robberbaronblog.disqus.com/deliciouscom_is_for_normal_people/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:58:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-72963535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The big problem is that &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; is a difficult tool. Digg and Reddit were direct competitors. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warts home remedies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-13906784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm assuming you mean this episode: &lt;a href="http://www.twit.tv/206" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.twit.tv/206"&gt;http://www.twit.tv/206&lt;/a&gt; ?  I'm downloading the podcast now, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jschwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-13896136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's funny that you posted this back in December - listen to TWiT this week - there's a long segment about Yahoo's failure to properly take advantage of/iterate Delicious and Flickr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amanda peyton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:52:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-5022754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just saw that you posted about Delicious, me too:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/12/how-i-use-delicious/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/12/how-i-use-delicious/"&gt;http://lifeinlists.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Its definitely useful to everyone, but I really don't think its close to being mainstream yet.  ReadWriteWeb had some interesting comments here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_publishes_top_search.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_publishes_top_search.php"&gt;http://www.readwriteweb.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I think they're suggesting that a very wide audience searches using Delicious, but only a narrow technical audience bookmarks using Delicious...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">angelsoft</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-4560583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Digg, Reddit, and &lt;a href="http://GetGlue.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="GetGlue.com"&gt;GetGlue.com&lt;/a&gt; all do a better job than Delicious on bubbling up interesting content.  Delicious is getting in its own way by trying to compete in this space.  If they simplified their message to "free your bookmarks from your browser" I think they would dramatically increase adoption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jschwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:18:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious.com is for normal people</title><link>http://robberbaronblog.com/2008/12/deliciouscom-is-for-normal-people/#comment-4531656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article.  I remember in 2003 thinking &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; was a byzantine site.  Utterly confusing.   I thought the same thing about RSS.  With RSS, it was just a matter of time before web-based tools became available and so darn easy that people couldn't help but use the feeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Del.icio.us"&gt;Del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; has a different problem.  It's not the basic concept that's getting in the way--people understand bookmarks.   OK, the greater concepts -- Folksonomy and community-based ranking --are hard to use on a daily basis without good tools.  The big problem is that &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; is a difficult tool.   Digg and Reddit were direct competitors.   Right now I like &lt;a href="http://GetGlue.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="GetGlue.com"&gt;GetGlue.com&lt;/a&gt;.   But I still love &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, the links in the article are going to &lt;a href="http://delicio.us.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="delicio.us.com"&gt;delicio.us.com&lt;/a&gt; which I don't think is the bookmarking service. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobKelley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>